Single-chart alerts miss the cross-section
An alert can fire on SOL, but that does not tell you whether SOL is actually strong versus ETH, INJ, XRP or the rest of the field. Aegium ranks the field so the signal is relative, not isolated.
Alternative
When alerts are too isolated, rank the whole market
TradingView alerts are good at telling you when one condition fired on one chart. Aegium starts from the opposite direction: rank the liquid crypto futures universe first, then decide where attention is deserved.
Useful when the problem is market selection, not another notification.
Aegium / alertsignal with context attached
MARKET INPUTS
TFTaker flow+72
FRFunding rankcrowded
OBBook pressurepersistent
CROSS-SECTIONRank + contextnot a naked alert
DECISION OBJECT / ETHStrong relative flow
LONG BIAS82
Regime constructive · crowding acceptable
reasoning attachedraw eventnormalizerankcontextdecision
01Field-level ranking02The live engines' published outcomes03Track-record-first product design
Outcomes matter before setups
Aegium pairs the ranking with a live market-neutral engine that trades it in public, with its outcomes published hourly. Whether the spread between strong and weak is paying is a measured fact on the record, not a chart opinion.
Less notification, more structure
The goal is not to make you react faster to every alert. It is to reduce the number of things worth reacting to.
Questions traders usually ask
Can I still use TradingView with Aegium?
Yes. Many traders will still chart manually. Aegium is meant to decide where attention belongs before opening another chart.
Does Aegium send alerts?
Accounts get engine alerts — a new high, a drawdown mark, a recovery, the daily brief — but the core product is a live market-neutral engine whose outcomes are published hourly, not a generic alert engine.
Keep reading
Connect the concept to the desk
Free while the record builds
See the edge where it is measured
Aegium turns flow, funding and liquidation context into a market-neutral book tracked in the open.